Files

Axel Meyer efa1a5ebcc test: sugar-form + mixed-form assertions for parse_lua_surface (S2 follow-up)

8 new assertions (sugar-form: 5, mixed-form: 3). Total 35 -> 43.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-05-16 16:07:15 +02:00

lib-core.api-discovery-test

Test-lib for lib-core.api-discovery (Tests-as-Libs per ADR-0037).

Coverage Statement

Per Fault-Injection-Audit-Convention (2026-05-16):

Function	Assertion-Count	Coverage
`parse_lua_surface`	15	Happy-path (2 public + 1 private), empty-source edge, sugar-form (`function M.foo`), mixed-form (sugar + explicit)
`parse_readme_api`	4	Standard H3-pattern, no-API-section edge
`diff_surface`	5	Equal (no diff), surface-superset (missing), doc-superset (stale)
`grep_engine_calls`	5	3 unique calls, no-calls edge
`generate_topology_block`	6	Lib-with-deps+engine, asset-lib (no deps, no engine)
`validate_readme_structure`	8	Complete core, missing-API core, missing-Topology, missing-Badges, community-tier-no-enforcement
TOTAL	43

Idiomatic-edge: M.foo = function ... end mit Multi-Line-Body wird durch pattern-line-match abgedeckt; very-creative-patterns (z.B. dynamic _ENV[k] = function...) sind by-design out-of-scope.
Doc-quality (sind die Function-Descriptions akkurat?) — sentiment-level question, kein assertion-target.

Mutation-Audit der Test-Lib selbst (analog 2026-05-16 Test-Coverage-Audit) — Folge-Slice.

Wird automatisch via --test-libs=lib-core.api-discovery-test ausgeführt (Smoke P0-S-batch Stage).